Handling Performance Discussions

a picture of Ben Houghton with a big head

Performance discussions - feedback or criticism?

Does you organisation gather valuable feedback and prepare well-structured performance discussions only to have it made ineffective by the human factor? Many people are caught up in the process and content of 'what' they are delivering and oblivious to how much their behaviour is influencing the other person. I have even experienced scenarios where the person giving the feedback is mindful of delivering it correctly and unaware how the other person is receiving it.

One thing that negates the value of performance discussions is defensive reactions; and defensive reactions are caused or fuelled by 'how' the feedback is delivered. If someone is defending themselves against the feedback, they are taking little of value from it. Can you imagine a professional sports person having a defensive reaction to feedback from their coach? It would never happen - not if they want to improve their performance.

If performance discussions are handled as an impartial and cooperative investigation into current performance, and an opportunity to investigate options and alternatives to improve performance in the future, they are remarkably empowering. Delivering feedback in this way and utilising the 'noggin' model can be a catalyst for immediate and positive behavioural change. If deployed on a large scale, this is a quantum leap in the direction of creating a culture of coaching within your organisation.

Intention

Methodology

Explicit content/techniques

Outcomes

Logistics

Handle Performance Discussions More Effectively Contact Noggin

To improve the way you handle performance discussions and develop a culture of coaching, why not contact us now?